Aan de slag met de collectie:
Japanse soldaten houden een Japans boerenechtpaar tot staan
Romeyn de Hooghe (mogelijk), ca. 1668
Mogelijk ontwerp voor een prent.
- Soort kunstwerktekening, ontwerp
- ObjectnummerRP-T-1937-23
- Afmetingenhoogte 258 mm x breedte 336 mm
- Fysieke kenmerkenpen en donkerbruine inkt, met penseelpunt en zwarte en grijze inkt, met penseel en grijze inkt, over sporen van zwart krijt; kaderlijn langs onderzijde in bruine inkt, gedeeltelijk versneden
Ontdek verder
Identificatie
Titel(s)
Japanse soldaten houden een Japans boerenechtpaar tot staan
Objecttype
Objectnummer
RP-T-1937-23
Beschrijving
Mogelijk ontwerp voor een prent.
Onderdeel van catalogus
Vervaardiging
Vervaardiging
tekenaar: Romeyn de Hooghe (mogelijk), Amsterdam (mogelijk)
Datering
ca. 1668
Zoek verder op
Materiaal en techniek
Fysieke kenmerken
pen en donkerbruine inkt, met penseelpunt en zwarte en grijze inkt, met penseel en grijze inkt, over sporen van zwart krijt; kaderlijn langs onderzijde in bruine inkt, gedeeltelijk versneden
Afmetingen
hoogte 258 mm x breedte 336 mm
Dit werk gaat over
Onderwerp
Verwerving en rechten
Verwerving
aankoop 1937
Copyright
Herkomst
...; ? sale, Samuel van Huls (1655-1734, The Hague), The Hague (J. Swart), 14 May 1736 _sqq._, Album CC, no. 1593 (‘[Romein de Hooghe] _105 Pièces de toutes sortes de Desseins à la Chinoise, don’t la plûpart ont servies pour faire les Estampes des Voyages de Dapper, Nieuhoff, Kircherus, &c. On les vendra en detail_’); ...; collection Christiaan Kramm (1797-1875), Utrecht (L. 581); his sale, Amsterdam (G.T. Bom), 30 November 1937, no. 90, fl. 14, to the dealer P. Brandt, for the museum
Opmerkingen
Deze herkomstzin is geformuleerd met een speciale focus op de periode 1933-45 en zou daarom nog onvolledig kunnen zijn. Er kan aanvullende herkomstinformatie in het museum aanwezig zijn. Indien het object een mogelijk niet-heldere of incomplete herkomst heeft voor de periode 1933-45, ontvangt het museum graag aanvullende informatie met betrekking tot de Tweede Wereldoorlog-periode.
Duurzaam webadres
Als u naar dit object wilt verwijzen, gebruik dan de duurzame URL:
Vragen?
Ziet u een fout? Of heeft u extra informatie over dit object? Laat het ons weten!
Romeyn de Hooghe (possibly)
Japanese Soldiers Halting a Japanese Peasant Couple
? Amsterdam, c. 1668
Inscriptions
inscribed by the artist: lower left, below framing line, in brown ink, dit sijn boere; numbered, in dark brown ink, from 1 (on digging spade, centre; helmet of horseman to the right) to 18 (on stocking lower left, changed into 19)
inscribed on verso: upper left, in a nineteenth-century (?) hand, 5-552
stamped on verso: lower right, with the mark of Kramm (L. 581)
Technical notes
watermark: circles; cf. Laurentius 2007, II, nos. 38 (Lisboa: 1666) and 39 (Madrid: 1665)
Provenance
...; ? sale, Samuel van Huls (1655-1734, The Hague), The Hague (J. Swart), 14 May 1736 sqq., Album CC, no. 1593 (‘[Romein de Hooghe] 105 Pièces de toutes sortes de Desseins à la Chinoise, don’t la plûpart ont servies pour faire les Estampes des Voyages de Dapper, Nieuhoff, Kircherus, &c. On les vendra en detail’); ...; collection Christiaan Kramm (1797-1875), Utrecht (L. 581); his sale, Amsterdam (G.T. Bom), 30 November 1937, no. 90, fl. 14, to the dealer P. Brandt, for the museum
Object number: RP-T-1937-23
The artist
Biography
Romeyn de Hooghe (Amsterdam 1645 - 1708 Haarlem)
He was the third child of the button maker Romeyn de Hooghe, sr (1620-1664) and Susanne Gerarts (1619-1673)1A. Bredius, ‘Uit de “Minute octrooien der Staten van Holland van West-Friesland” and “Losse aanteekeningen omtrent Hollandsche plaatsnijders”’, in F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, VII (1890), p. 249. and was baptized on 10 September 1645 in the Zuiderkerk in Amsterdam.2A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 24, n. 4. His family, from his father’s side, had immigrated to Amsterdam from Ghent in the late sixteenth century. He attended the Latin School and was probably trained as a printmaker. His earliest etchings are copies after Nicolaes Berchem (1621/22-1683), one dated 1662 (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-55.011), the same year that he enrolled in the Guild of St Luke in The Hague.3Ibid., p. 12. From 1663 to 1668 he was back in Amsterdam, and in 1667 he received his first commission as a book illustrator.4The title print of the poem De Zee-straet by Constantijn Huygens (1596-1687); cf. A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 12-27, fig. 2, after a drawn design by Jan de Bisschop (1628-1671). The same year, his first newsprints were published, illustrating the raid by the Dutch navy under Admiral Michiel de Ruyter (1607-1676) near Rochester and Chatham (e.g. inv. nos. RP-P-OB-79.256 and RP-P-OB-79.257), the latter after one of several paintings of the subject by Willem Schellinks (1623-1678). Romeyn de Hooghe continued to make newsprints until the end of his life, increasingly after his own designs, such as Peace Treaty at Breda between England and the Dutch Republic of 1667 (e.g. inv. no. RP-P-OB-67.707), of which his design is preserved in the Albertina, Vienna (inv. no. 10163).5H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 126-45, fig. 8.
In the summer of 1668, De Hooghe went to Paris. There, he produced a print of the baptism ceremony of the French Dauphin.6H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, fig. 2.3. By 1669, he was again back in Amsterdam, living on the Reguliersgracht in the south-eastern part of the city. On 1 May 1673, he posted marriage banns with Maria Lansman (1649-1718) from Edam, the 23-year old daughter of Anna Mits (1628-1679) and the late Andreas Lansman (1625-1666), a minister of the Reformed Church in Amsterdam.7A.D. de Vries, ‘Biografische aanteekeningen betreffende voornamelijk Amsterdamsche schilders, plaatsnijders, enz. en hunne verwanten’ (II), Oud-Holland 3 (1885), p. 153. In 1674, the couple moved to the Jonge Roelofssteeg and in 1677 to the Binnenkant Canal (presently Binnenkant 27). Their only daughter, Maria Romana, was baptized on 14 March 1674 in the Nieuwezijdskapel in Amsterdam. She died in December 1694, age twenty.
As a printmaker, with his shop located at the Kalverstraat from 1674 and from 1676 at Dam Square, Romeyn de Hooghe became the leading chronicler of his generation, addressing a wide audience with his newsprints and broadsides. From 1670, he contributed the yearly frontispiece for the Hollandsche Mercurius in Haarlem, a cooperation that was to last until 1690.
In the mid-1670s, De Hooghe was also active as an art dealer and agent, apparently profiting from his good contacts to the Sephardic Jewish community. One of its members, Franciscus Mollo (1648/49-1721), became his major partner in business. Mollo had established contact with the Polish king Jan III Sobieski (1629-1696), for whom De Hooghe bought paintings at auctions, for instance, at the sale of Joannes de Renialme Jansz (1641-1687) on 7 May 1687. Between 1673 and 1685, De Hooghe etched several portraits of Jan Sobieski, who raised him to the rank of ‘servitor’ in 1675, granting him freedom of taxes from the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth.
In 1682, the De Hooghe and his family moved to Haarlem, where they lived in a house on the Geldelozepad. In 1683, Romeyn enlisted as a member of the city’s artist society, Confrerie Pictura, probably to attend the newly founded Drawing Academy.
After settling in Haarlem, Romeyn’s rise in social status, already evident from his acquisition in 1675 of a feudal tenure at Borrendam, near Schouwen in the province of Zeeland, resulted in several communal functions. In 1686, he was one of the three regents of the Pietershuis, a private foundation supporting poor orphans. In 1687 and 1688, he served as magistrate (‘commissaris’) of the Minor Bench of Justice (‘Kleine Bank van Justitie’) and on 3 June 1689, he received a doctorate in law at the University of Harderwijk. By 1690, he had become a regent of the Armekinderhuis, the municipal orphanage of Haarlem. In 1695, he bought a fief in Heemstede in Kennermerland. In 1706, he was appointed custodian of the Hortus Medicus in Haarlem, which had been laid out to his design in 1696. In 1688, Romeyn planned to establish a drawing school in Haarlem. Probably running from 1692, the drawing school was situated in the Ridderstraat, at the back of the garden of his newly-built house at the Nieuwe Gracht 13, where the De Hooghe family had moved in July 1689.
In 1688/89, Romeyn was involved in the so-called ‘pamphlete quarrel’ (‘pamflettenstrijd’), his antagonist being the Amsterdam advocate Nicolaas Muys van Holy (c. 1653/54-1717), leader of the Anti-Orange party.8C. van de Haar, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe en de pamflettenstrijd van de jaaren 1689 en 1690’, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 69 (1956), pp. 155-69. In the same period, he produced the ‘Harlequin Prints’, satirical broadsides aimed against the politics of King Louis XIV of France (1638-1715) and taking the side of the Stadholder-King Willem III (1650-1702). After 1689, Romeyn also acted as a political agent on behalf of the Stadholder. Supporting Willem III had its rewards. In 1689, Romeyn was appointed commissary and supervisor of the mining district of Lingen, an office from which he profited in many ways. He was allowed to move his drawing school to a bulwark facing the river Spaarne that was given to him for storing the Lingen bluestone, and he became supplier of bluestone for the Palace Het Loo. De Hooghe was also involved in designing the gardens of that newly-built palace.
Romeyn de Hooghe was an extremely productive and versatile artist. In the course of almost forty-five years, he made over 4300 prints. As a book illustrator, he worked for 170 different publishers and contributed to at least 465 book titles, including reprints. Thematically, the subjects ranged from the Bible to a wrestling manual and scientific works, such as the Aeloude en hedendaegsche scheeps-bouw (1671) of Nicolaes Witsen (1641-1717). Besides prints of portraits, battles, historic events, stately homes and princely gardens, maps, festivities and erotic subjects, he also designed commemorative coins, garden sculpture and stained-glass windows. Although not trained as a painter, he occasionally produced wall and ceiling paintings, for instance in the archer’s hall (‘doelen’) of the militia of St George in Rotterdam (1699-1700). His magnum opus in this respect were the murals in the mayor’s chamber (‘burgemeesterskamer’) in the Town Hall of Enkhuizen, 1707.9M. van Eikema Hommes and P. Bakker, ‘Hoogachtbaarheid en ontzaglijke grootheid. De burgemeesterskamer van het stadhuis van Enkhuizen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 222-43, figs. 1-6.
Of his many pupils, only a few are known, such as Filibertus Bouttats (1635-1707), Adriaen Schoonebeeck (c. 1657/58-1705), Aernout Naghtegael (1658-1737), Jacobus Harrewijn (1660-1727), Frans Decker (1684-1751), François Harrewijn (1700-1764) and Laurens Scherm (active 1689-1701). A truly universal artist, Romeyn de Hooghe died on 10 June and was buried on 15 June 1708 in St Bavo, Haarlem.
Annemarie Stefes, 2019
References
A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, III (1721), pp. 257-65; J.C. Weyerman, De levens-beschryvingen der Nederlandsche konst-schilders en konst-schilderessen, 4 vols., The Hague/Dordrecht 1729-69, I (1729), p. 93; III (1729), p. 114; F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, I (1877-78), pp. 124, 151; II (1879-80), pp. 2-4, 7; III (1880), pp. 200, 206; IV (1881-82), pp. 107-08, 155; V (1882-83), p. 318; VII (1888-90), pp. 31, 33, 38, 41, 53, 156, 249; F. Muller, De Nederlandsche geschiedenis in platen. Beredeneerde beschrijving van Nederlandsche historieplaten, zinneprenten en historische kaarten, 4 vols., Amsterdam 1863-82, I (1863-70), pp. 331-34, 336, 338, 347-48, 350-51, 357, 359-60, 362, 364-65, 367-68, 370, 374, 376-84, 387-94, 396-402, 405, 407, 411-18, 426-28, 430, 433-34, 436-37, 443-45, 447, 450, 454, 458-60; A. von Wurzbach, Niederländisches Künstlerlexikon, 3 vols., Vienna/Leipzig 1906-11, I (1906), pp. 718-19; U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, XVII (1924), pp. 458-61 (text by M.D. Henkel); F.G. Waller, Biographisch woordenboek van Noord Nederlandsche graveurs, The Hague 1938, p. 149; J. Landwehr, Romeyn de Hooghe the Etcher: Contemporary Portrayal of Europe, 1662-1707, Leiden 1973, pp. 15-16; W.H. Wilson, The Art of Romeyn de Hooghe: An Atlas of European Late Baroque Culture, 3 vols., Cambridge (MA) 1974 (PhD diss. Harvard University), I, pp. 21-69; F.W.H. Hollstein et al., Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, c. 1450-1700, 72 vols., Amsterdam and elsewhere 1947-2010, IX (1953), pp. 118-32; M.J.C. Otten, ‘Biografie van Romeyn de Hooghe’, De Boekenwereld 5 (1988-89), pp. 20-33; E. Buijsen (ed.), Haagse schilders in de Gouden Eeuw. Het Hoogsteder Lexicon van alle schilders werkzaam in Den Haag, 1600-1700, Zwolle 1998, p. 316; P. Groenendijk, Beknopt biografisch lexicon van Zuid- en Noord-Nederlandse schilders, graveurs, glasschilders, tapijtwevers et cetera van ca. 1350 tot ca. 1720, Utrecht 2008, pp. 418-19; H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008; A. Ott, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe as a Designer of Prints for the Publisher Jacob van Meurs’, Delineavit et Sculpsit 34 (2010), pp. 20-27; H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018; RKD artists https://rkd.nl/artists/39559
Entry
The present sheet represents an exotic scene of a mounted soldier menacing a pair of peasants while a second soldier appears to mediate. Judging from faces and attire, the scene takes place in Asia, and the couple carrying their harvest are identified as peasants by an autograph inscription (‘dit sijn boeren’). There were probably more inscriptions, corresponding to the numbers spread over the sheet, which mark such details as armour and weapons to agricultural tools and which must have corresponded to a lost legend.
The drawing was inventoried as an illustration for a geographical opus (‘aardrijkskundig werk’), with the peasant figures considered to be Chinese. Wilson accepted the attribution, described the figures as ‘Four Oriental Soldiers’ and assumed the design to relate to one of the artist’s major illustrative projects, Curieuse Aenmerckingen der bysondereste Oost en West-Indische Verwonderenswaerdige Dingen (‘Curious observations of the most remarkable things of the East and West Indies’; Utrecht 1682) by Simon de Vries (1624-1708).10W.H. Wilson, The Art of Romeyn de Hooghe: An Atlas of European Late Baroque Culture, 3 vols., Cambridge (MA) 1974. (PhD diss., Harvard University), II, p. 354. However, no corresponding print has been identified. Was the drawing a rejected design for this publication, or, given its large format compared to the printed illustrations (c. 190 x 290 mm), might it have been an independent work?
Romeyn de Hooghe’s work as an illustrator of travel accounts is further documented by a group of 105 ‘Chinese drawings’ given to Romeyn de Hooghe in the 1736 Van Huls sale, a group to which the present sheet may well have belonged. These designs were described as preparatory for etchings in the ‘Voyages de Dapper, Nieuhoff, Kircherus, &c.’, that is, Asia, of Naukeurige Beschryving van Het Rijk des Grooten Mogols (‘Asia, or accurate description of the empire of the great Mughals’; Amsterdam 1672) by Olfert Dapper (1636-1689), to which the museum’s inv. no. RP-T-1941-21 is related, Het Gezantschap der Nederlandtsche Oost-Indische Compagnie, aan den Grooten Tartarischen Chan, (‘The embassy of the Dutch East India Company to the great Tartar Khan’; Amsterdam 1665) of Joan Nieuhof (1618-1672); or Toonneel van China (‘Theatre of China’; Amsterdam 1668) by Athanasius Kircher (1602-1680).
Yet the figures depicted in the drawing are not necessarily Chinese. In fact, they more closely resemble types found in travelogues on Japan. The major contemporary book on Japan was the Gedenkwaerdige Gesantschappen der Oost-Indische Maetschappy [...] aen de Kaisaren van Japan by Arnoldus Montanus (1625-1683), published by Jacob van Meurs (?-1679) in Amsterdam in 1669. Although not based on first-hand experience, it addressed material collected by members of the VOC who travelled Japan in 1643-50.11R.H. Hesselink, ‘Memorable Embassies: The Secret History of Arnoldus Montanus Gedenkwaerdige Gesantschappen’, Quaerendo 32 (2002), pp. 99 and 105. An illustration on page 65 shows soldiers carrying a sort of strapped basket like the foot soldier in the present sheet. Similar types of clothing, footwear, saddles and tools are seen in other illustrations, as is the distinctive hairstyle of the fishermen found on page 54, which Montanus described as being similar to that of monks, ‘the fishermen wear a bald crown with the hair hanging around their heads like a fringe, not unlike the shorn monks of the papacy’ (‘De visschers dragen een kaele kruin alleenlijk hangt ‘t hair rondom ‘t hoofd kroons-gewijs, niet ongelijk de geschooren monniken in ’t pausdom’). De Hooghe contributed at least one drawn design for an illustration in Montanus’s book, The Dutch Legate Entering the Temple of Daibot in the Special Collections, Universiteit Leiden (inv. no. PK-T-AW-1150),12A. Ott, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe as a Designer of Prints for the Publisher Jacob van Meurs’, Delineavit & Sculpsit 34 (2010), pp. 20-27 (fig. 1). and there might well have been others. This would imply a date of circa 1668-69 for the present sheet, as Montanus and Van Meurs received their material in 1668.13R.H. Hesselink, ‘Memorable Embassies: The Secret History of Arnoldus Montanus Gedenkwaerdige Gesantschappen’, Quaerendo 32 (2002), p. 111. The unusual type of watermark – used in Portugal and Spain in the mid-1660s – may suggest that De Hooghe made it while already in Paris.14The ‘foreign’ watermark of the Leiden drawing (a cardinal’s hat, probably of French manufacture) was interpreted as pointing to Romeyn’s stay in Paris in 1668; cf. A. Ott, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe as a Designer of Prints for the Publisher Jacob van Meurs’, Delineavit & Sculpsit 34 (2010), p. 23.
There are certainly are stylistic analogies to authentic drawings by the artist from this early period in his career. Inv. no. RP-T-1942-8, carried out by 1671, features similar broad brushstrokes and deep accents along the contours. The delicate hatching in the peasants’ faces and the nervously drawn contours are comparable to traits in inv. no. RP-T-00-332 from 1688. Moreover, the fragmentary inscription on the present drawing may by the hand of Romeyn de Hooghe and can be compared to that on inv. no. RP-T-1942-8 or other samples of his handwriting. Despite this, there are a few anatomical weaknesses, such as the crooked fingers of the female peasant and of the standing soldier, each holding a staff in almost the same stance, or the overly short right arm of the male peasant, apparently lacking a forearm, though these do not exclude an attribution to him.15Cf. H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 143.
Annemarie Stefes, 2019
Literature
Verslagen omtrent ’s Rijks Verzamelingen van Geschiedenis en Kunst 1937, 60 (1938), p. 30 (‘blad met Chineesche boeren [...] een illlustratie voor de een of andere reisbeschrijving]); W.H. Wilson, The Art of Romeyn de Hooghe: An Atlas of European Late Baroque Culture, 3 vols., Cambridge (MA) 1974 (PhD diss., Harvard University), II, pp. 353-54, no. 7 (‘Four Oriental Soldiers’), fig. 255
Citation
A. Stefes, 2019, 'possibly Romeyn de Hooghe, _, Amsterdam, c. 1668', in J. Turner (ed.), _Dutch Drawings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/200140846
(accessed 24 mei 2026 15:32:10 UTC+0).Footnotes
- 1A. Bredius, ‘Uit de “Minute octrooien der Staten van Holland van West-Friesland” and “Losse aanteekeningen omtrent Hollandsche plaatsnijders”’, in F.D.O. Obreen, Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, 7 vols., Rotterdam 1877-90, VII (1890), p. 249.
- 2A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 24, n. 4.
- 3Ibid., p. 12.
- 4The title print of the poem De Zee-straet by Constantijn Huygens (1596-1687); cf. A. de Haas, ‘Commissaris van zijne majesteit en mikpunkt in faamrovende paskwillen. Een biografische schets’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 12-27, fig. 2, after a drawn design by Jan de Bisschop (1628-1671).
- 5H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 126-45, fig. 8.
- 6H. van Nierop, Life of Romeyn de Hooghe (1645-1708): Prints, Pamphlets and Politics in the Dutch Golden Age, Amsterdam 2018, fig. 2.3.
- 7A.D. de Vries, ‘Biografische aanteekeningen betreffende voornamelijk Amsterdamsche schilders, plaatsnijders, enz. en hunne verwanten’ (II), Oud-Holland 3 (1885), p. 153.
- 8C. van de Haar, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe en de pamflettenstrijd van de jaaren 1689 en 1690’, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 69 (1956), pp. 155-69.
- 9M. van Eikema Hommes and P. Bakker, ‘Hoogachtbaarheid en ontzaglijke grootheid. De burgemeesterskamer van het stadhuis van Enkhuizen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, pp. 222-43, figs. 1-6.
- 10W.H. Wilson, The Art of Romeyn de Hooghe: An Atlas of European Late Baroque Culture, 3 vols., Cambridge (MA) 1974. (PhD diss., Harvard University), II, p. 354.
- 11R.H. Hesselink, ‘Memorable Embassies: The Secret History of Arnoldus Montanus Gedenkwaerdige Gesantschappen’, Quaerendo 32 (2002), pp. 99 and 105.
- 12A. Ott, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe as a Designer of Prints for the Publisher Jacob van Meurs’, Delineavit & Sculpsit 34 (2010), pp. 20-27 (fig. 1).
- 13R.H. Hesselink, ‘Memorable Embassies: The Secret History of Arnoldus Montanus Gedenkwaerdige Gesantschappen’, Quaerendo 32 (2002), p. 111.
- 14The ‘foreign’ watermark of the Leiden drawing (a cardinal’s hat, probably of French manufacture) was interpreted as pointing to Romeyn’s stay in Paris in 1668; cf. A. Ott, ‘Romeyn de Hooghe as a Designer of Prints for the Publisher Jacob van Meurs’, Delineavit & Sculpsit 34 (2010), p. 23.
- 15Cf. H. Leeflang, ‘Waarheid, vlugheid en inventie. Ontwerp en uitvoering van de etsen’, in H. van Nierop (ed.), Romeyn de Hooghe. De verbeelding van de late Gouden Eeuw, Zwolle 2008, p. 143.











